Summary Basis of Decision for Balversa

Review decision

The Summary Basis of Decision explains why the product was approved for sale in Canada. The document includes regulatory, safety, effectiveness and quality (in terms of chemistry and manufacturing) considerations.


Product type:

Drug

Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) documents provide information related to the original authorization of a product. The SBD for Balversa is located below.

Recent Activity for Balversa

SBDs written for eligible drugs approved after September 1, 2012 will be updated to include post-authorization information. This information will be compiled in a Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT). The PAAT will include brief summaries of activities such as submissions for new uses of the product, and whether Health Canada's decisions were negative or positive. PAATs will be updated regularly with post-authorization activity throughout the product's life cycle.

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT) for Balversa

Updated:

2020-09-28

The following table describes post-authorization activity for Balversa, a product which contains the medicinal ingredient erdafitinib. For more information on the type of information found in PAATs, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions: Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Project: Phase II and to the list of abbreviations that are found in PAATs.

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02493217 - 3 mg, erdafitinib, tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493225 - 4 mg, erdafitinib, tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493233 - 5 mg, erdafitinib, tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493241 - 4 mg tablet, oral administration (starter pack)

Post-Authorization Activity Table (PAAT)

Activity/submission type, control numberDate submittedDecision and dateSummary of activities
Drug product (DINs 02493217, 02493225, 02493233) market notificationNot applicableDate of first sale:
2019-12-09
The manufacturer notified Health Canada of the date of first sale pursuant to C.01.014.3 of the Food and Drug Regulations.
NDS # 2245292019-02-08Issued NOC under NOC/c Guidance
2019-10-25
NOC issued under the NOC/c Guidance for New Drug Submission.
Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for Balversa

Date SBD issued: 2020-01-28

The following information relates to the new drug submission for Balversa.

Erdafitinib

Drug Identification Number (DIN):

  • DIN 02493217 - 3 mg tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493225 - 4 mg tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493233 - 5 mg tablet, oral administration
  • DIN 02493241 - 4 mg tablet, oral administration (starter pack)

Janssen Inc.

New Drug Submission Control Number: 224529

On October 25, 2019, Health Canada issued a Notice of Compliance under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance to Janssen Inc. for the drug product Balversa. The product was authorized under the NOC/c Guidance on the basis of the promising nature of the clinical evidence, and the need for further follow up to confirm the clinical benefit. Patients should be advised of the fact that the market authorization was issued with conditions.

The market authorization was based on quality (chemistry and manufacturing), non-clinical (pharmacology and toxicology), and clinical (pharmacology, safety, and efficacy) information submitted. Based on Health Canada's review, the benefit-risk-uncertainty profile of Balversa is favourable for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma:

  • whose tumours have susceptible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and
  • who have disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical effectiveness of Balversa is based on objective response rates and duration of response from a single-arm Phase II trial in patients with specific genetic alterations in FGFR2 or FGFR3.

Treatment with Balversa should be initiated following confirmation of a susceptible FGFR genetic alteration using a validated test.

1 What was approved?

Balversa, a protein kinase inhibitor, was authorized for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma:

  • whose tumours have susceptible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and
  • who have disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical effectiveness of Balversa is based on objective response rates and duration of response from a single-arm Phase II trial in patients with specific genetic alterations in FGFR2 or FGFR3.

Treatment with Balversa should be initiated following confirmation of a susceptible FGFR genetic alteration using a validated test.

Data regarding the use of Balversa in patients younger than 18 years of age have not been submitted to Health Canada. Therefore, Health Canada has not authorized an indication for pediatric use.

Of the 87 patients treated with Balversa in Study BLC2001, 53 (61%) were 65 years of age or older. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between elderly and younger patients.

Balversa is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to this drug or to any ingredient in the formulation, including any non-medicinal ingredient, or component of the container.

Balversa was approved for use under the conditions stated in its Product Monograph, taking into consideration the potential risks associated with the administration of this drug product.

Balversa (3 mg, 4 mg, and 5 mg erdafitinib) is presented as a tablet. In addition to the medicinal ingredient, the tablet contains croscarmellose sodium, ferrosoferric oxide/iron oxide black (for the brown tablets only), glycerol monocaprylocaprate Type I, iron oxide red (for the orange and brown tablets only), iron oxide yellow, magnesium stearate (from vegetable source), mannitol, meglumine, microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol partially hydrolyzed, sodium lauryl sulfate, talc, and titanium dioxide.

For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

Additional information may be found in the Balversa Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

2 Why was Balversa approved?

Health Canada considers that the benefit-harm-uncertainty profile of Balversa is favourable for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma:

  • whose tumours have susceptible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and
  • who have disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Balversa was authorized under the NOC/c Guidance on the basis of the promising nature of the clinical evidence, and the need for further follow-up to confirm the clinical benefit.

Urothelial carcinoma, also known as transitional cell carcinoma, arises from the urothelium, which lines the urinary tract from the renal pelvis to the urethra. It accounts for 90% of bladder cancer. Bladder cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in Canada, with an estimated 8,900 Canadians diagnosed in 2017.

The family of fibroblast growth factor receptors consists of four related protein tyrosine kinases (FGFR1, 2, 3 and 4), present in many types of normal and tumour cells. Activation of the FGFR pathway has been shown to play an important role in tumour cell growth, survival, and migration as well as in maintaining tumour angiogenesis. Mutations and gene fusions of FGFR genes are detected in approximately 15% to 20% of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers. The medicinal ingredient in Balversa, erdafitinib, is an oral pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been shown to bind to and inhibit FGFR. This may result in the inhibition of FGFR-related signal transduction pathways in FGFR-overexpressing tumour cells. Erdafitinib has demonstrated antitumour activity in FGFR-driven cell lines and xenograft models derived from multiple tumour types, including bladder cancer.

Balversa has been shown to be efficacious in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The market authorization with conditions was based on efficacy and safety data from one single-arm Phase II trial (BLC2001) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose tumours had susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations. The efficacy analysis was based on 87 patients whose disease progressed during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients were treated with Balversa at a daily dose of 8 mg, up-titrated to 9 mg once daily in patients with acceptable tolerability whose serum phosphate levels, measured between days 14 and 17, were below the target of 5.5 mg/dL. Balversa was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a median duration of treatment of 5.3 months, and a median duration of follow-up of 11.3 months, the investigator-assessed objective response rate was determined to be 40.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.9%, 50.5%). The objective response rate as determined by an independent committee was supportive of the investigator assessment.

The detected responses appeared durable, with a median duration of response of 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2 months, 7.0 months), as assessed by the investigator. Subgroup analyses for the different FGFR genetic alterations demonstrated clinical responses in patients with tumours harbouring FGFR3 point mutations and FGFR3 fusions. No responses were observed in patients whose tumours had FGFR2 fusions; however, there were too few of these patients (number of patients [n] = 6) enrolled in Study BLC2001 to conclude that Balversa lacks efficacy in these rare molecular subsets. Based on the totality of evidence, including biological feasibility, data from in vitro studies, and results from study patients with other FGFR genetic alterations, it was considered reasonable to conclude there is promising evidence of efficacy for the recommended Balversa indication to encompass all of the genetic alterations harboured by patients enrolled in Study BLC2001.

The primary safety data from the Phase II Study BL2001 (n = 87) and integrated safety data from across the studies in this submission (n = 164), revealed a consistent safety profile of Balversa. Only the data from the 87 patients from Study BLC2001 were included in the final Balversa Product Monograph.

In Study BLC2001, the most common adverse events were hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, dry mouth, decreased appetite, dry skin, alopecia, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, dry eye, onycholysis, paronychia, and nail dystrophy.

Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 41% of patients, including eye disorders in 10% of patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 67% of patients, most commonly as stomatitis, nail dystrophy, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, paronychia, nail disorder, keratitis, onycholysis, and hyperphosphatemia. Dose interruptions and dose reductions due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 68% and 53% of patients, respectively, most commonly due to hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, eye disorders, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome. Myocardial infarction was the only adverse event with a fatal outcome (one patient).

The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was hyperphosphatemia (in 76% of patients), which was managed by dose interruption (24%), dose reduction (7%), and phosphate binders (34%), when necessary. Phosphate elevations did not appear to be associated with any clinical sequelae (there were no reports of cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, renal, or metabolic dysfunction).

Central serous retinopathy (CSR) occurred in 25% of patients in Study BLC2001. The most commonly reported CSR events were chorioretinopathy, retinal detachment, and detachment of retinal pigment epithelium. These events were primarily managed with dose interruption (9%) and dose reduction (14%), and 3% of patients permanently discontinued treatment due to CSR. Baseline ophthalmological exams and monthly monitoring for eye disorders were important risk mitigation measures implemented in Study BLC2001, and have been included as recommendations in the Balversa Product Monograph.

Overall, the safety profile of erdafitinib was considered acceptable, with adverse events typically manageable by dose reduction, temporary treatment discontinuation and standard medical care. The Balversa Product Monograph includes recommendations regarding adverse event monitoring and dose modifications, as well as reference to physician educational materials pertaining to the diagnosis and management of CSR.

Additional efficacy and safety data will be assessed when the final report of the ongoing, randomized Phase III confirmatory trial is submitted to Health Canada, as part of the conditions under the NOC/c Guidance.

A Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Balversa was submitted by Janssen Inc. to Health Canada. Upon review, the RMP was considered to be acceptable. The RMP is designed to describe known and potential safety issues, to present the monitoring scheme and when needed, to describe measures that will be put in place to minimize risks associated with the product.

The submitted inner and outer labels, package insert and Patient Medication Information section of the Balversa Product Monograph meet the necessary regulatory labelling, plain language and design element requirements.

A Look-alike Sound-alike brand name assessment was performed and the proposed name Balversa was accepted.

Overall, the data from Study BLC2001 provided promising evidence of clinical effectiveness and demonstrated a favourable benefit-risk profile for the target patient population. The identified safety issues can be adequately managed through labelling and sufficient monitoring. Appropriate warnings and precautions are in place in the Balversa Product Monograph to address the identified safety concerns. As described within the framework of the NOC/c Guidance, safety monitoring of the use of Balversa will be ongoing. Further evaluation will take place upon the submission of the final report of the ongoing randomized Phase III Study BLC3001.

This New Drug Submission complies with the requirements of sections C.08.002 and C.08.005.1 and therefore Health Canada has granted the Notice of Compliance pursuant to section C.08.004 of the Food and Drug Regulations. For more information, refer to the Clinical, Non-clinical, and Quality (Chemistry and Manufacturing) Basis for Decision sections.

3 What steps led to the approval of Balversa?

The sponsor filed a request for Advance Consideration under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance for the review of the new drug submission (NDS) for Balversa. An assessment of the request was conducted and it was determined that there was promising evidence that the benefit-risk profile of Balversa would be improved over existing therapies for advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma, a serious and life-threatening disease.

Subsequent review of the NDS for Balversa led to the decision to issue the sponsor market authorization under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance, in recognition of the promising but unconfirmed evidence of clinical effectiveness in the submission. In keeping with the provisions of the NOC/c Guidance, the sponsor agreed to provide additional information to confirm the clinical benefit.

Submission Milestones: Balversa

Submission MilestoneDate
Pre-submission meeting:2018-12-17
Acceptance of Advance Consideration under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance:2019-02-07
Submission filed:2019-02-08
Screening
Screening Acceptance Letter issued:2019-03-08
Review
Quality Evaluation complete:2019-09-04
Labelling Review complete, including Look-alike Sound-alike brand name assessment:2019-09-09
Clinical/Medical Evaluation complete:2019-09-20
Review of Risk Management Plan complete:2019-09-23
Notice of Compliance with Conditions Qualifying Notice (NOC/c-QN) issued:2019-09-23
Review of Response to NOC/c-QN
Response filed (Letter of Undertaking):2019-10-04
Clinical/Medical Evaluation complete:2019-10-23
Notice of Compliance (NOC) issued by Director General, Therapeutic Products Directorate under the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance:2019-10-25

For additional information about the drug submission process, refer to the Management of Drug Submissions Guidance.

4 What follow-up measures will the company take?

In addition to requirements outlined in the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations, and in keeping with the provisions outlined in the Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOC/c) Guidance, the sponsor has agreed to submit to Health Canada:

  • As a Supplement to a New Drug Submission - Confirmatory (SNDS-C), the final report for the confirmatory study entitled: Study 42756493BLC3001 - A Phase III study of erdafitinib compared with vinflunine or docetaxel or pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced urothelial cancer and selected FGFR gene aberrations.

6 What other information is available about drugs?

Up to date information on drug products can be found at the following links:

7 What was the scientific rationale for Health Canada's decision?
7.1 Clinical basis for decision

Clinical Pharmacology

The medicinal ingredient in Balversa, erdafitinib, is an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that binds to and inhibits all FGFR family members, FGFR 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Erdafitinib demonstrated dose-independent pharmacokinetic properties across the dose range of 0.5 to 12 mg. According to a population pharmacokinetic model, the typical volume of distribution was estimated to be 18.9 L, demonstrating limited distribution outside the extravascular space. As erdafitinib is a drug with low extraction ratio, its clearance is dependent on plasma protein binding influences, and the total apparent oral clearance was approximately 0.2 L/h. The mean effective half-life was 76.4 hours. Steady state is expected to be achieved after approximately 16 days. At steady state, erdafitinib demonstrated approximately 5.1-fold accumulation in plasma area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24).

No clinically meaningful differences in the pharmacokinetics of erdafitinib were observed based on age, sex, race, body weight, mild or moderate renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment.

In a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, a slope model with power exponent to link free erdafitinib concentrations at biophase with serum phosphate concentrations was demonstrated. This model was used to demonstrate that erdafitinib-induced serum phosphate increase is a surrogate of clinical efficacy, as patients with serum phosphate concentrations in the target window (5.5-7.0 mg/dL) have a significant likelihood of achieving a clinical response.

Based on evaluation of QTc interval in an open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study in 187 patients with cancer, erdafitinib had no large effect (i.e., >20 ms) on the QTc interval.

For further details, please refer to the Balversa Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Efficacy

The efficacy of Balversa for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma was based on evaluation of data from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm Phase II study (BLC2001). The study enrolled 210 patients, whose tumours had specific FGFR genetic alterations (one of the following FGFR3 gene mutations: R248C, S249C, G370C, Y373C or one of the following FGFR gene fusions: FGFR3-TACC3, FGFR3-BAIAP2L1, FGFR2-BICC1, FGFR2-CASP7, as determined by a clinical trial assay performed at a central laboratory).

The key efficacy conclusions were based on data derived from 87 patients who had disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy. These patients received Balversa at a starting dose of 8 mg once daily, with a dose increase to 9 mg once daily, based on tolerability, in patients whose serum phosphate levels, measured between days 14 and 17, were below the target of 5.5 mg/dL. A dose increase occurred in 41% of patients. Balversa was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The median duration of treatment was 5.3 months, and the median duration of efficacy follow-up was 11.3 months. The follow-up duration was considered reasonable for efficacy assessment in order to establish promising evidence of efficacy of Balversa in the target patient population, as patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma have a poor prognosis, with a five-year survival rate of only approximately 5%.

The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate assessed by the investigator using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Additionally, if the primary objective (objective response rate higher than 25%) was achieved as per investigator assessment, independent radiologic review committee (IRRC) assessment was also to be performed.

The investigator-assessed objective response rate was determined to be 40.2% (95% CI: 29.9%, 50.5%), including three complete responses. The objective response rate as determined by the IRRC was 32.2% (95% CI: 22.4%, 42%), including two complete responses. Of note, for urothelial cancer there are known limitations and challenges with treatment response assessment based only on RECIST criteria, as only the longest tumour diameter is measured. Measurement of bladder wall lesions and infiltrative bladder lesions can lead to large inter- and intraobserver variations, especially for tumours with irregular shape. Accordingly, the discordance observed between the investigator assessment and the IRRC assessment of the objective response rate is considered acceptable. The results from both assessments have been included in the Balversa Product Monograph.

The detected responses appeared durable, with a median duration of response of 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2 months, 7.0 months), as assessed by the investigator. Subgroup analyses for the different FGFR genetic alterations demonstrated clinical responses in patients with tumours harbouring FGFR3 point mutations and FGFR3 fusions, whereas no responses were observed in patients whose tumours had FGFR2 fusions. However, there were too few of these patients enrolled in Study BLC2001 to conclude that Balversa lacks efficacy in these rare molecular subsets. Based on the totality of evidence, including biological feasibility, data from in vitro studies, and results from study patients with other FGFR genetic alterations, it was considered reasonable to conclude there is promising evidence of efficacy for the recommended Balversa indication to encompass all of the genetic alterations harboured by patients enrolled in Study BLC2001.

The promising efficacy results remain to be confirmed in the ongoing, randomized Phase III confirmatory trial, which enrolled patients based on the same molecular eligibility criteria used for Study BLC2001.

Indication

The New Drug Submission for Balversa was filed by the sponsor with the following indication:

  • Balversa is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, whose tumours have certain fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genetic alterations, who have disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Upon review of the submission, Health Canada revised the proposed indication to reflect the FGFR genetic alterations from Study BLC2001. Furthermore, the revised indication included a caveat statement to summarize the limitations of the clinical effectiveness data derived from a single-arm Phase II trial and highlighted the recommendation for confirmation of a susceptible FGFR genetic alteration prior to initiating treatment. Accordingly, Health Canada approved the following indication:

  • Balversa is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma:
    • whose tumours have susceptible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and
    • who have disease progression during or following at least one line of prior chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Clinical effectiveness of Balversa is based on objective response rates and duration of response from a single-arm Phase II trial in patients with specific genetic alterations in FGFR2 or FGFR3.
  • Treatment with Balversa should be initiated following confirmation of a susceptible FGFR genetic alteration using a validated test.

For more information, refer to the Balversa Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

Clinical Safety

The safety of Balversa was evaluated in 87 patients from the Phase II Study BLC2001 (described in the Clinical Efficacy section).

All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Dose interruptions and dose reductions due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 68% and 53% of patients, respectively. The treatment-emergent events most commonly leading to dose modifications (interruptions and/or reductions) included hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, eye disorders, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (PPES).

Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 67% of patients, and serious adverse events were reported in 41% of patients. There was a fatal adverse event (acute myocardial infarction) in one patient.

Hyperphosphatemia was the treatment-emergent adverse event reported with the highest frequency (76%). Other common treatment-emergent adverse events reported with a frequency higher than 20% were stomatitis, diarrhea, dry mouth, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, dry skin, fatigue, constipation, alopecia, PPES, asthenia, nausea, onycholysis, dry eye, and anemia.

The most common Grade 3-4 adverse events were stomatitis, nail dystrophy, PPES, paronychia, nail disorder, keratitis, onycholysis, and hyperphosphatemia.

Central serous retinopathy (CSR) adverse events were reported in 25% of patients. The most commonly reported CSR events were chorioretinopathy, retinal detachment, and detachment of retinal pigment epithelium.

The safety database was considered sufficiently large to characterize the overall safety profile of single-agent Balversa in the target patient population, although the number of patients enrolled in the study was not large enough to allow detection of rare adverse events. Additionally, due to the single-arm study design, a causal association between single-agent Balversa and reported adverse events could not be established.

Overall, the safety profile of Balversa is considered acceptable. The adverse events can be adequately managed by dose reduction, temporary treatment discontinuation and/or standard medical care. The Balversa Product Monograph includes recommendations regarding adverse event monitoring and dose modifications, as well as reference to physician educational materials pertaining to the diagnosis and management of CSR.

For more information, refer to the Balversa Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.2 Non-Clinical Basis for Decision

Erdafitinib, the medicinal ingredient in Balversa, was demonstrated to be a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, with antitumour activity observed in FGFR-driven cancer cells and xenograft models.

Erdafitinib showed substantial selectivity against most other kinases tested in vitro.

Erdafitinib demonstrated potent inhibition of cell proliferation (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]<1 nM) in cell lines overexpressing FGFR2 fusion genes. In vivo studies showed tumour regression in a patient-derived xenograft model of liver cancer with the FGFR2:CCDC6 gene fusion and 50% tumour growth inhibition in two patient-derived xenograft models of non-small cell lung cancer with FGFR2:COL25A or FGFR2-MCU gene fusion.

In safety pharmacology studies, erdafitinib was found to be a human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) blocker, associated with QT prolongation in guinea pigs and dogs. Minimal neurofunctional aberrations were observed in rats.

Following repeated oral administration of erdafitinib to rats and dogs, the primary toxicities involved disturbance of phosphate homeostasis leading to soft tissue mineralization and cartilage dysplasia. Dental changes, effects on female reproductive organs, atrophy of glandular and epithelial structures, and changes to hair coat and nails were also observed.

Erdafitinib exhibited teratogenicity and embryo-fetal toxicity in rats, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

Erdafitinib was not genotoxic in vitro or in vivo. No long-term carcinogenic studies were conducted or warranted to support the proposed indication.

The results of the non-clinical studies as well as the potential risks to humans have been included in the Balversa Product Monograph. In view of the intended use of Balversa, there are no pharmacological or toxicological issues within this submission to preclude authorization of the product.

For more information, refer to the Balversa Product Monograph, approved by Health Canada and available through the Drug Product Database.

7.3 Quality Basis for Decision

The Chemistry and Manufacturing information submitted for Balversa has demonstrated that the drug substance and drug product can be consistently manufactured to meet the approved specifications. Proper development and validation studies were conducted, and adequate controls are in place for the commercial processes. Changes to the manufacturing process and formulation made throughout the pharmaceutical development are considered acceptable upon review. The drug product is stored at room temperature (15ºC to 30ºC).

Proposed limits of drug-related impurities are considered adequately qualified, i.e., within International Council for Harmonisation limits and/or qualified from toxicological studies.

All sites involved in production are compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices.

All non-medicinal ingredients (i.e., excipients) found in the drug product are acceptable for use in drugs according to the Food and Drug Regulations. None of the excipients used in the formulation of Balversa is of human or animal origin.